Once again the New York Times, in an effort to help Democrats has screwed up again. Let me shoot some bullets at this.

• There is no evidence that McCain screwed Vicki Iseman
• There are several times when Vicki Iseman and her clients went before McCain's subcommittee and ended up not getting what they wanted.
• This rumor is nine years old. Why didn't this come out the last time McCain ran for president?
• Lannie Davis, a Clinton supporter and former administration official, said he had no knowledge of impropriety.
• Exculpatory evidence given by the campaign and a lot of others never saw the light of day.
• The New York times ran the story after learning The New Republic was doing a story about the New York Times and strife in the news room over whether to run the story or not.
• Alcalde & Fay, Vicki Iseman's firm said in a statement that it was "based upon the fantasies of a disgruntled former campaign employee."

Basically this is much ado about nothing. Bill Clinton is noticeably silent.

Michelle Obama is now learning that the margin for error is zero. She made a statement during a campaign speech that said "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country."

Here come the bullets.

• She has no pattern of saying unpatriotic things, either spoken or in print.
• She has awkwardly done an explanation and retraction and it should be left at that.

This too, is much ado about nothing.